Own the whole topic,
not just one keyword

Check them. Every gap in your report links to the page or the search where we observed that question. Open a few at random. We built the audit this way because the honest answer to 'trust us' is that you should not have to.

Scope and price. An agency runs $3,000 to $15,000 a month and keeps running until you cancel, because a retainer has no natural end. Here the audit sizes the work up front, you approve it before paying, and the subscription cancels itself when the last batch lands. What an agency gives you that we do not: a human strategist on a call, link building, and someone to chase your team for input.

Because writing was never the bottleneck. Those tools will happily produce fifty articles about whatever you type in, which is how sites end up with a large archive and nothing to show for it. The expensive part is knowing which articles are worth writing and being able to check that answer. That is the part we do first, and the part we let you audit.

Whatever your site genuinely justifies. Your audit groups the gaps into batches of 8 to 15 articles each, and you buy the batches that qualify — that might be three, it might be twelve. You see the exact article count and what it costs before you pay anything. We do not sell a fixed number and then go looking for topics to fill it.

Anything an article claims about your product has to trace back to your own website or something you confirmed during setup. Facts from anywhere else are attributed to the page they came from, and never rewritten as though they were about you. Articles are checked against that rule before delivery, and a failing one is rewritten rather than shipped.

They are not thrown away. If a question has enough real demand behind it, it becomes its own article. If it does not, it becomes a clearly labelled section inside a related article instead of disappearing. What we will not do is pad an article with filler sections to make a number look bigger.

We tell you, and the subscription cancels itself. That is the whole point. Tools that bill monthly forever cannot admit the useful topics ran out, so around month three they quietly start rewriting what you already published. We would rather lose the fee than do that.

Read them before publishing, always. Research, structure, internal links and images are done, so you are editing rather than writing. Anyone promising zero human review is selling you something they have not read either.

Then we will not sell you a program. There is no minimum number of batches you have to hit — a small scope is simply a smaller program. But if nothing on your site qualifies at all, the audit says so and checkout stays closed. A refund in month two costs us both more than a no today.

Yes — each site gets its own audit and its own program, so a founder running two products can run two. It is built for the person who owns the product, though, not for agencies: there are no client workspaces, white-label reports or approval chains.

No, and be careful with anyone who does. We can prove which questions your market searches, which ones your site does not answer, and that we delivered publishable articles for them. What search engines do next is not ours to guarantee.

English only for now, in either US or UK spelling. We would rather do one language properly than several badly, so we will announce another when it genuinely reaches the same standard.